quattroworld.com Forums: in CA it would have to be a "muzzle brake" not a "flash suppressor"

Firearms

All messages | Search Forums | Return to Firearms

in CA it would have to be a "muzzle brake" not a "flash suppressor"
Posted by: nyet (2) on 2014-04-09 13:17:04 \| Moderator In Reply to: For a 30" min OAL, might as well go with the 18" barrel. posted by ryoung on 2014-04-08 22:19:37	Share \| Report

though it isn't clear which is which, legally speaking, lol

Thread:

I think I decided on what to build with my 4th lower. - DIY 2014-04-07 15:54:37 (179 views)
- I'd just get a Tavor. - ryoung 2014-04-07 18:39:39 (128 views)
  - Can you have those here in CA? - DIY 2014-04-08 16:12:38 (80 views)
    - yes, but... - Pablo 2014-04-08 20:55:50 (87 views)
      - For a 30" min OAL, might as well go with the 18" barrel.  -  ryoung  2014-04-08 22:19:37 (82 views)
        
        in CA it would have to be a "muzzle brake" not a "flash suppressor"  -  nyet  2014-04-09 13:17:04 (88 views)
        
        LOL ... living in a mostly free State, I'm not up to speed on evil features.   -  ryoung  2014-04-09 16:53:48 (84 views)
        
        And a stock.   -  Pablo  2014-04-09 07:32:53 (85 views)
  - 2nd. - Pablo 2014-04-07 19:49:55 (91 views)
- looks fun. this highlights how ridiculous the laws are. - phil type R 2014-04-07 16:25:29 (91 views)
  - Even more rediculous here. It will have to be made on an 80% lower that I manufacture. :-) - DIY 2014-04-07 17:41:59 (90 views)
    - In CA, can you legally build a pistol for personal use? - ryoung 2014-04-07 18:47:10 (90 views)
      - Yes. - Paul 2014-04-08 14:01:36 (73 views)

post follow up

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:

Login with existing account
Create a new account

All messages | Search Forums | Return to Firearms

Terms of Use

Copyright

Privacy Policy